ARC423 Advanced Building Systems Spring 2003 - Review 1 |
|
 |
||||||||||||||
| Day | Date | Time | Team | |||||||||||
 |
||||||||||||||
| Tuesday | February 25 | 7:00 pm | High
rise office buildings Seagrams Building by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe with Philip Johnson in New York NY vs AT&T (now Sony) in New York NY by Philip Johnson Wesley Schwartz, Howard Wang, Robyn Bell, Paul Soper, Dave Kaplan |
|||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Thursday | February 27 | |||||||||||||
| 2:00 pm | Research
Laboratories: Science Center, Wellesley College by Perry Dean Rogers vs Patscenter at Princeton NJ by Richard Rogers Sei Hyuck Ahn, Paul Herbert, Dennis Hidalgo, Christopher Russell, Jia Shin |
|||||||||||||
| 7:00 pm | Fire Stations:
Corning, by Gunnar Birketts, Olean, by Werner Seligmann, Syracuse #1, by Skoler/Lee. Jeff Beardsley, Erica Stahl, Laura Klock, Steev Wilson |
|||||||||||||
| 8:00 pm | Museums: Everson Museum of Art in Syracuse NY by I. M. Pei vs. Johnson Museum of Art at Cornell University, Ithaca NY by I. M. Pei Dustin Ehrlich, John Attili, Lesha Blair, Scott Mandeville |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Monday | March 3 | 12:00 | Research
labs: Multicategorical Research Laboratory at Cornell University, Ithaca NY by Ulrich Franzen vs the Agronomy Research Laboratory at Cornell University, Ithaca NY by Ulrich Franzen. Eric Godin, Chris Burdick, Josh Pettler, Brian Down, Jermaine Moure |
|||||||||||
| 1:00 | The
Corning Musum of Glass in Corning NY, Phase 2 by Gunnar Birkerts vs. Phase 3 by
Smith-Miller + Hawkinson Ki Ho Choi,Whitney Izor, Kristian Kowal, Mick McNutt, Zhe Wang, |
|||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
| Instructions: | ||||||||||||||
| email your team's first and second preference as soon as possible. First come
first served. As appointments are booked they will be listed on this page. If none of the
times listed above are possible, make me an offer and I will make every effort to
accommodate you. Be sure to list your team names and the buildings being compared. |
||||||||||||||
| This first review tends to focus on coming to an understanding of the buildings
themselves. Thus it is more analytical in nature. The second review is often focused on
the presentation to be made. For the review, the more you have, the more we have to work with. You must provide a revised version of the statement of the
analysis, particularly focusing on the view taken and the points to be made. Drawings,
overlays and diagrams of the working drawings together with photos of the actual building,
are most useful but the only specific requirement is an updated copy of the project form. |
||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
